Black Holes and Planck Cores

I think we should not make black holes so mysterious. They are similar to all other sizable orbs in the universe — planets and stars — because the ‘force of gravity’ is intense enough to overpower other forces and transmute matter-energy into different forms via a reaction. In some cases it is nuclear reactions breaking down the matter-energy in the orb. In other cases it is a very dense high energy state of the core and reactions and phases at energy levels we can only imagine.


We already know about dense iron cores of planets, and stars made entirely of neutrons, and there is speculation of quark stars and so on. Well, just imagine all that as layers inside a black hole. As the density, energy, and compression of spacetime increase, the amount of matter-energy in a small space grows as we would expect. So the ultimate question is whether there is a limit to the density of matter-energy?

A Star – Wikipedia
Neutron Star – Wikipedia

In astrophysics and nuclear physics, nuclear pasta is a theoretical type of degenerate matter that is postulated to exist within the crusts of neutron stars. If it does in fact exist, nuclear pasta is the strongest material in the universe. Between the surface of a neutron star and the quark–gluon plasma at the core, at matter densities of 1014 g/cm3, nuclear attraction and Coulomb repulsion forces are of similar magnitude. The competition between the forces leads to the formation of a variety of complex structures assembled from neutrons and protons. Astrophysicists call these types of structures nuclear pasta because the geometry of the structures resembles various types of pasta.


Let’s focus on the core. Let’s say the black hole ingests an atom of something on the periodic table. Aside : I am using the interpretation that the event horizon is not a hard clank onto the Planck core. I am not exactly sure what nature actually does. Calling all astrophysicists to collaborate! As that atom proceeds towards the center (possibly in a spiral or chaotic path at some layers) the atom will start reacting due to the forces acting upon it. At some point the atom will decompose into protons, neutrons, electrons, photons, neutrinos, and other exotics. Then those will reduce to quarks and electrons and photons and Noether engines and the whole standard model. What comes next? Why do scientists say that the standard matter particle-wave duality objects are fundamental and indivisible, yet they can transmute from one to another? Do standard matter particles decompose to a new level of elementary energy carrying objects? Of course they do!

Albert and Mileva Einstein’s math does not define a limit on the radius or curvature of spacetime. That means people get all weird and wonky about singularities and wormholes although I think most scientists dismiss those out of hand. The real question then is what does nature do at that scale? I’ll put my money on dusting off point charges from the physics discard pile and giving those point charges immutability at the scale of the Planck length. How does that work? In an orbiting dipole, there is a limit at field speed times pi/2 which defines the maximum curvature of the orbit, and also the lower limit of orbital radius. Furthermore, it doesn’t appear to be a problem for a positive and negative point charge to occupy the same (t,x,y,z) point — it is as if they pass right through, over, or under each other.

A writhing mass of immutable point charges ultimately gets so closely packed that kinetic energy drops to zero. The structure freezes relative to the other point charges. One microstate. Entropy equals zero. That is a huge breakthrough in understanding of nature’s limit.

When we say that a Planck core freezes, that is with kinetic energy as the root cause of temperature. It is another of nature’s wonders to associate a frozen state of point charges with the ultimate high energy state of point charges. Yet, this is just an artifact of how we measure kinetic energy as temperature, which is a subset of total energy, which includes electric potential energy. No wonder physics is so confused about entropy and information. When packed into a Planck core each point charge is carrying the Planck energy, which is the highest possible energy that can be carried by a point charge.

Note : I described an idealized non-spinning SMBH scenario. I look forward to professionals figuring out what to make of a spinning Planck core. A spinning core has kinetic energy again. Perhaps the maelstrom is required to truly reach the Planck core state. Is high spin required to create a polar breach and jet event? We are talking frame dragging as intense as possible near the core.

Immutable point charges and the Planck core state are what replaces the singularity and prevents a number of issues in physics caused by the unnatural assumption that dipole orbital radius goes to zero and curvature goes to infinity. This mechanism also provides a physical explanation for the accepted science that says black holes have a temperature of zero degrees. We must conclude that general relativity is incredibly accurate at large scales relative to point charges, because ultimately there are physical electric, kinetic, and geometric limits. There are also steps and complicated manifolds depending on what exactly is in proximity or flying by at any moment in absolute time.

Every immutable point charge in a Planck core carries the Planck energy in an ultimate convergence of potential and kinetic forms. Perhaps to reach this ultimate Planck core state may require some level of spin of the solid Planck core. Imagine the field lines emanating from each electrino and positrino. This is another point where the concepts are somewhat overwhelming and it would be very helpful to have collaborators. My guess is that this will all be child’s play for the professionals. This stuff gets right to the core of the virial theorem and how we define potential energy and all the related bedrock theories.

It’s ironic that just as particles decompose as energy and density increase so do theories have a run or a range of applicability. The farther you drill down, the more you understand how higher level theories were able to be predictive and accurate in their ranges of applicability. An interesting and fun problem is figuring out which theories apply as you get down to those final few Planck lengths before the immutable point charge structure freezes. This is highly relevant to the determination of what is fundamental and what is emergent. For example, is the Planck scale emergent in some sense?

Turns out, that when immutable point charges, with a sphere of immutability, get close enough and are cubic packed (FCC or HCP), the math produces a 10113 energy density which is a number QFT also generates but has no clue what it means. This is called the cosmological constant problem or the vacuum catastrophe. Also, if you think about it, the interior particles of that Planck particle core would have no way to transmit their energy since their potential emissions are cancelled by superposition. Imagine that! All the energy held in that interior volume that was formerly gravitationally attracting mass when stuff fell in to the black hole is now no longer participating in gravity. This might have something to do with galaxy rotation curves. Also, a Planck core would have only one microstate, thus entropy of zero and zero information. That knocks down some big problems and also affects the 2nd Law. The Planck core has a two-dimensional surface area of outer point charges that can exchange energy outward at that moment. I guarantee you this is not like gentle reaction. This is the most rigid matter-energy possible interfacing with the next-most rigid matter-energy. Talk about frame dragging!

Let’s not forget that the surface or apparent energy presented by a Planck core is a very small fraction of the shielded interior energy that is shielded via superposition. Volume grows as the cube of radius. Area grows as the square of radius. I will leave it to the brilliant people of the next era to figure out when and where energy and/or mass shielding occur and under what conditions. It appears to be something that will cross over many disciplines and the first exercise will be to understand if there are any dynamical energy or mass shielding processes in their purview. Here’s a bizarre clue : It seems that protons and neutrons somehow uncork the energy of the generation II and III dipoles which had been shielded in the ingredient quarks. Is this possible? How does it work? What was the exact sequence in which they formed and why were they resilient at that energy and lower?

I’m thinking this is the reality of how black holes work and that means an adjustment will be needed in current black hole theory from these new insights.

J Mark Morris : San Diego : California

p.s., I hope that my writings are useful to creative people who seek inspiration in how other people put together ideas in new or discarded ways, but somehow differently to reveal new insights. Doing so is not only an art but it can be a precursor to any intellectual activity. It is an effort to understand the network of connections and the strength of any area of the network. It involved seeking inconsistencies, weaknesses, and the poker tell of the physicists. Imagination and new ideas are unconstrained at least at first in specific domains trying to develop connections and insights. Over time one expands that ontological scaffolding to gain more and more insight and understanding. This is really the progress of science, the state of the art network of understanding. Occasionally we are fortunate to experence a paradigm shift that transforms the foundations. Those are super-fun eras of science because so much opportunity and investment is available. I hope you enjoy following the development of the next era : immutable point charge physics as described by NPQG.

p.p.s. March 2023 : A highly relevant video from Anton.