Categories
Physics

Rethinking Neutrino Structure

I have been contemplating whether an electron neutrino is solely a relatively low energy Noether core 3 : 3 with the three rotating dipole orbitals oriented at different angles. Another possibility I have been pondering is that an electron neutrino could be a Noether core as just described along with a 3:3 personality layer, so that an electron neutrino would be 6:6 = 3:3[3:3]. I need to spend some more time thinking about this, reviewing the known physics, and balancing various reactions, i.e., what physicists call decays.

I have written before about the hypothesis that spacetime aether (aka Noether core detritus, superfluid, dark matter particles, gravitons, Higgs Field generators) can provide input reactants in the form of relatively low energy point charge structures as well as consume products of a reaction that are also in the relatively low energy range that cannot yet be directly detected.

Think of the aether as a facilitator of transmutation that provides structure templates that can be reorganized, divided, and energized. How did anyone ever believe that a Neutron just magically decays into a Proton and two other standard matter particles are observed shooting out. Again it is the priors. When you come to believe that all of nature is a superposition of abstract mathematical fields then it sort of appears reasonable for fields to morph into other fields. To be sure there is a lot of math behind that morphing, but I believe it will map to NPQG and lead to improved mathematical modeling.

One appealing idea is that a photon and a neutrino are one and the same, but at different energy levels and phases. Let’s imagine that a photon has these characteristics :

  • is a 6:6 point charge structure,
  • consisting of a Noether core and an anti-Noether core,
  • at coupled energy levels,
    • similar — does this imply the cores are offset planar?
    • different — one core doubles as personality layer?
  • and the cores counter-rotate to make the E & B fields,
  • with all orbitals in planes perpendicular to the velocity,
  • and it redshifts continuously as it travels through aether,
  • aether which is expanding local to each galaxy,
  • and the photon is still moving at local speed of light,
  • and the photon eventually redshifts away enough energy,
  • such that the flat-ish boson shape starts puffing out,
  • meaning the orbital planes un-align like a fermion shape,
  • revealing more shielded energy as mass,
  • and at some point puffs up enough to no longer be a boson and to drop out of local c velocity.

If that is roughly what is happening, THEN a bosonic photon could very well redshift into becoming a fermionic 6:6 neutrino. That is a fascinating idea because it ties the redshift based life cycle of the photon as it becomes a neutrino which redshifts further and eventually becomes spacetime superfluid aether. It is a crucial test of NPQG to see if it can tie many processes together at many levels.

It also occurs to me that a sterile neutrino could be the energy core without a personality layer. In that case it may also have three generations. As we understanding more about the structure it will be possible to relatively easily simulate reactions and understand various regimes of what I believe physicists call the configuration space. A chemist might call it the phase diagram of nature and the universe.

Incorporating these new photon and neutrino structure ideas into the NPQG point charge architecture appears to add more symmetry, flexibility, and consistency. It may also extend the mapping of NPQG to existing physics theory. I think I’ll make a new branch of my depictions of the point charge structure as an aide for further thought experiments.


Let’s set aside for a moment the very high energy environments such neutron star cores, black holes, magnetars, quasars, supernovas, and the like. There appear to be at least two different large scale processes that introduce relatively small scale energy changes in the aether. These all superimpose of course. Think of the aether as providing a floating alternating energy ground. Around dense matter the local aether energy skyrockets. In deep intergalactic space the aether settles in at around 2.8 Kelvin in apparent kinetic energy.

  1. Proximity to orbiting point charges in standard matter structures which manifests as a lossless A/C gravity wave that imparts RMS energy. N.B. this is somewhat self referential as I presume the aether particles will be classified as standard matter at some point. Certainly aether particles influence each other as that is how gravity waves traverse the universe.
  2. Redshift of standard matter structure energizes the aether, no matter what is passing through.

The idea that redshifting photons and neutrinos energize the aether is a fascinating one. The redshift energy transfer mechanism is in opposition to the galaxy local expansion of the aether towards less energetic galaxy hinterlands. How cool is that? Two completely different aether energizing processes and yet they interact with each other.

There are a couple of open problems in physics that have a sort of shift in slope that is not understood. The Hubble number H0 discrepancy is one. The other is the MOND theory that has a formula transition differentiating intragalactic and intergalactic. See my recent post about Dr. Justin Khoury’s recent paper that I think is a HUGE step forward for the professional physicists. Perhaps these ideas map to one or the other of those areas of interest.

Still, we really need to understand how a photon can redshift in h-bar angular momentum quanta while traveling through gradually expanding galaxy local aether? I haven’t studied this physics. Could it be implemented by a gradual shift in phase? Sort of like a continuous second hand and an h-bar minute hand?

Y. Minami/KEK

I see that there are various concepts such as cosmic polarization rotation, cosmic birefrigence, and Faraday rotation. We must remember that after escaping the gravity well of their origin, photons are travelling through spacetime aether particles that are each individually expanding towards intergalactic regions. Does that gradient have a slow but cumulative effect on each photon?

I need to make a visual for the concepts of apparent energy, shielded energy, and mass. This is all easily understandable visually and emminently sensible in the point charge architecture and may even lead to revisions in terminology and basic instruction in science. Physics will be so much more accessible in the new era.


Random fleeting thought : I think it is important to say that a tick is a tick in a sense, sort of like c is c. By ‘tick’ I mean one full cycle of the orbital of an electrino:positrino dipole. These are all local concepts. Everything needs to be translated into absolute Euclidean coordinates in space and time.

J Mark Morris : Boston : Massachusetts

By J Mark Morris

I am imagining and reverse engineering a model of nature and sharing my journey via social media. Join me! I would love to have collaborators in this open effort. To support this research please donate: https://www.paypal.me/johnmarkmorris

https://johnmarkmorris.com
https://twitter.com/J_Mark_Morris
https://www.reddit.com/r/NPQG/
https://www.facebook.com/NPQG/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnmarkmorris/

2 replies on “Rethinking Neutrino Structure”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s