Categories
Physics

Dr. Brian Keating : Dr. Janna Levin

I wrote a long comment in response to this YouTube video, which I will include below.

Dear Brian,
@13:25 when Janna starts ‘dispelling myths about black holes’ — I differ strongly with Janna that when she says black holes are not dense, that they are empty, that they are in some sense nothing at all. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Look, it is all so simple. All you get in the whole universe is 3D Euclidean void space (not Einstein’s spacetime) and two types of particles : equal and opposite, charged, energy carrying, IMMUTABLE, Planck radius spheres. There are two free parameters in the universe. 1) the density of the spheres (presumably a 50/50 distribution) and 2) the energy density carried by those spheres. Those spheres make everything, including spacetime. Charged spinning dipoles are the first structure to emerge (tau v). Then all of the rest of the standard model.

Now think about what that simple premise means in a supermassive black hole. That IMMUTABLE condition on the Planck spheres is going to do a lot of heavy lifting. Because that means when the packing of the spheres and energy gets to the density of nearest neighbor adjacency (HCP? FCC?) at the Planck energy — that is where the shrinking of spacetime stops. That is the phase change to solid Planck core. One microstate. No relative spin to each other (although the core is spinning as a whole). No local kinetic energy. Zero temperature. This is the ultimate battery in the universe. One microstate means no entropy.

The internal Planck particles in a Planck core can not even transmit their energy as mass because all of their neighbors are maxed out. I call that mass hiding and it could have something to do with galaxy dynamics. So to counter Janna – that is ultimately dense and ultimately non-empty of matter and energy. Information is destroyed.

The really beautiful part of this theory is that while all the physicists are doing amazingly complicated and intense things, they are actually trying to figure things out the hard way. The physicists and cosmologists are in a crisis because there is a string of 6 or so major decision points that were unfortunately wrong so that it is difficult for scientists to even imagine what I am saying. However, if you will suspend disbelief and just spend some time with the idea, hopefully it will click and once it does, it becomes rather obvious. I mean we have these huge jets coming out of galaxy SMBH for long periods and its pretty clear that the galaxy is recycling, and once you realize that spacetime is a construct too (an aether, oops M/M) then you see that the jet is bang/inflation and the driver of expansion from spacetime dispersing energy.

I already wrote in another comment that you still get to keep universe wide expansion. It’s just that its galaxy local and into one another! How many galaxies are on the observable surface layer of the universe that you were looking at with Planck and BICEP2? What if each of those galaxies is like a giant furnace occasionally burping out plumes of new spacetime and standard matter via their SMBH. It’s gonna look a lot like remnants of a Big Bang — and actually it is compatible with theory, because the original theory does not require that it happened at a single time (!!!), nor place. In fact scientists wave their hands and say it happened all over. I am offering you a physical implementation of bang/inflation/expansion happening all over, forever. I could go on, and on, but I already wrote 150+ very easy reading blog articles on this at jmarkmorris.com. Check it out. First real card carrying scientist that catches on has a huge opportunity, because I am not in the field.


@19:45 Janna tells a fascinating story about Einstein not believing in black holes. It will be really interesting for historians to study what Einstein knew and when. I wonder how strong the case is that he figured out how the universe works, i.e., what I have been commenting on. Could he have actually figured it out and then masked the solution to the universe in this idea of spacetime as a geometry, which is such an abstract imaginative concept? It was unheard of at the time.

Could Einstein have anticipated that it was too dangerous in that era in world history to reveal the theory of everything? Remember Einstein wrote seminal papers on Brownian motion in 1905 and 1908. I can very easily imagine Einstein turning his attention to immutable charged particles and their motion at various energy levels. How structure would emerge as opposites attract and form spinning dipoles. The more energy, the tighter the spin, the shorter the radius. What is the limit? Planck. Ok, charged Planck radius spheres. He may have arrived at that idea in the 1905-1910 timeframe.

Where were we, oh yeah, the more energy the tighter the spin the shorter the radius, what? Hmm that sounds a lot like how spacetime works near dense matter energy. All we need to do is tie in the changing permittivity and permeability of space based on local conditions (energy, charged planck spheres, motion, structure, electric and magnetic fields). There is some multi-dimensional reaction space that describes what happens under all of these conditions. What structure emerges? how long is it stable? What does it decompose to ultimately? Matter tending back towards the Planck core in the SMBH (and then back out via the jets as the spinning SMBH overpowers the event horizon at the poles).

I am usually not a believer in conspiracy theories, but I do know that it is very difficult to keep a secret with more than two people. So if Einstein had figured it all out, then could he have quietly locked away and never disclosed the true discovery and instead released the mathematics that describe the behaviour of the spacetime aether? I also think that Mileva was still quite influential and perhaps doing a lot of the heavy lifting for Albert at that time. I’m not claiming Einstein discovered the TOE to the universe, but I think it is possible and that it would be interesting for historians to investigate. They would also need to examine other curiousities such as how Einstein reacted to QM and of course EPR.

J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : December 9, 2020 : v1

By J Mark Morris

I am imagining and reverse engineering a model of nature and sharing my journey via social media. Join me! I would love to have collaborators in this open effort. To support this research please donate: https://www.paypal.me/johnmarkmorris

https://johnmarkmorris.com
https://twitter.com/J_Mark_Morris
https://www.reddit.com/r/NPQG/
https://www.facebook.com/NPQG/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnmarkmorris/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s