Predictions of NPQG

NEOCLASSICAL PHYSICS AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Imagine that nature is emergent from pairs of Planck scale fundamental particles, the electrino and the positrino, which are equal yet oppositely charged. These are the only carriers of energy, in electromagnetic and kinetic form. Now add in an infinite 3D Euclidean space (non curvy) and Maxwell’s equations. 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 explores this recipe for nature and how it emerges as a narrative that is compatible with GR and QM, yet far superior in ability to explain the universe and resolve open problems. For 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 basics see: Idealized Neoclassical Model and the NPQG Glossary.

The scientific method espouses predictions that may be tested. These come in three categories that have differing weight.

  1. A new prediction that diverges from existing theory and is then confirmed by experimental evidence carries the most weight.
  2. A post-diction that provides a superior reinterpretation of experimental observation carries medium weight.
  3. A post-diction which reconfirms interpretation of experimental observation without adding new insight, carries the least weight.

In this post, I’ll list a number of predictions of NPQG with commentary, including testability and post-diction potential.

NPQG PredictionCommentary and Testability
There are two fundamental classical particle types in nature, with equal and opposite charge. NPQG calls these electrino and positrino.Prediction Type 1.
Direct measurement of these particles is well beyond the experimental capability circa 2020. Indirect support of this prediction is possible.
The electrino and positrino are spherical with a Planck radius.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
The electrino and positrino are conserved, indestructible, and immutable.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
The electrino has -1/6 charge and the positrino has +1/6 charge.Prediction Type 1.
This is the present (2018-2020) stake in the ground on fundamental particle charge in NPQG.
While it is possible to have an imbalance in electrinos and positrino count in a composite particle, overall the number of electrinos is equal to the number of positrinos. It is as if they originally came in pairs.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
Spacetime is implemented by physical particles that form a gas or superfluid.Prediction Type 1.
There is ongoing work searching for axions and gravitons which may yield a detection.
The background for the universe is a truly empty Euclidean void space. It does not curve or interact. It is immutable. It may be infinite.Post-diction Type 3.
This can be inferred by a new understanding of how Einstein’s curvy spacetime is implemented. Also, superluminal black hole jets provide indirect evidence.
Information is not preserved in a black hole that contains a Planck core.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
A Planck core (or more broadly—a near Planck black hole core that contains particles with metrics approaching Planck scale) may breach the event horizon of a black hole under sufficient conditions.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
A Planck core or near-Planck core may breach the event horizon in a collision of a black hole and other high energy objects, such as black holes or neutron stars.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
There are no wormholes.Prediction Type 1.
You can’t test to prove a negative, but it is possible to create a complete theory that does not appeal to wormholes.
There is no singularity in a black hole.This is already acknowledged by physicists, but they don’t yet understand the internals of black holes. You can’t test to prove a negative, but it is possible to create a complete theory that does not appeal to singularities.
The entropy of a Planck core is zero.Prediction Type 1.
Not observable. Supportable with theory only.
Energy is only carried by electrinos and positrinos. Furthermore the energy carried by electrinos is only in electromagnetic and kinetic energy.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
Electrinos and positrinos make composite particles.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
Composite particles often have a neutral shell of electrinos and positrinos that travel a wave equation. Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
The proton, electron, and neutron are composite particles with a shell and payload.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
The photon and neutriino are composite particles with a shell and no payload.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
All other particles in the standard model and PDG are composite particles made from electrinos and positrinos.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
P and CP symmetry will be maintained when considering reactions with local spacetime particles.Prediction Type 1.
Beyond 2020 scale of experimental testability. Indirect theoretical support of this prediction is possible.
The speed of light varies with the energy of spacetime gas. The energy of spacetime gas is related to its permittivity and permeability.Prediction Type 1.
Experimental validation is possible with a reinterpretation of astronomical observations.
Gravitational lensing is really refraction through various temperatures of spacetime gas around a massive object.Prediction Type 1.
Experimental validation is possible with a reinterpretation of astronomical observations.
The universe is not expanding. Spacetime gas may flow locally. This may help explain the H0 tension.Post-diction type 3.
A one-time inflationary Big Bang is not necessary to describe the universe.Post-diction type 3.
The universe age is much greater than 13.8 billion years.Post-diction type 3.
This fits much better with evidence from astronomical observation.
There are unaccounted forms of redshift and blueshift related to photon interaction with energy gradients in the spacetime gas.Post-diction type 3.
The radius of composite particle shells varies with shell energy according to the Lorentz equation.Prediction Type 1.
Time is implemented by the speed of the electrinos and positrinos in composite particle shells.Prediction Type 1.
Time can not go backwards.Prediction Type 1.
A Planck core can not present gravitational mass. (mass hiding)Prediction Type 1.
An ideal Planck core has one microstate.Prediction Type 1.
Planck plasma jets emitting from a black hole can be superluminal.Post-diction type 3.
Already measured, but cause not attributed correctly in some observations.
Many reactions described in the PDG (particle data guide) do not account for all reactions. They are missing the spacetime particle inputs and outputs.Post-diction type 3.
Anti-matter is a misnomer. The proton contains a positron payload. The neutron contains an anti-neutrino payload. There is no baryon asymmetry.Post-diction type 3.
The collapse of the wave function in a composite particle shell is implemented by a quantized transfer of energy.Post-diction type 3.
Composite particles implement a wave via the paths of the electrinos and positrinos in the particle shell. Wavelength is the linear distance travelled while the wave equation is traversed to a configuration symmetric with the starting point. Post-diction type 3.
The interaction of electrino and positrinos in composite particle shells with other shells is the continuous alternating electromagnetic ebb and flow of what is called gravity waves. The accumulated energy of particle shells interaction waves causes spacetime gas particles to implement an energy accumulator of sorts that rises and falls as a function of impinging gravitational waves. The gradient of composite shell temperature (energy) is proportional to the force of gravity. Gravity is implemented by convection, such that matter-energy particles seek higher temperature spacetime gas because the kinetic ‘potential’ energy in the composite particle shell seeks equilibrium in temperature with surrounding shells, which are primarily particles of spacetime gas.
[Note: seek to articulate this more clearly and precisely after writing a post on potential energy, the virial theorem, etc.]
Prediction Type 1.
The CMB is the black body radiation of spacetime gas. (Not the remnants of a one time inflationary big bang).Post-diction type 3.
The second law of thermodynamics can be rewritten as an equality when considering all particles, i.e., including spacetime gas. The total entropy of any reaction when accounting for all particles, including spacetime gas, is constant.Post-diction type 3.
There are no magnetic monopoles to be found in nature.Prediction Type 1.
Figure 1 illustrates the temperature profile of spacetime gas. Imagine two equal ‘masses’ at top left and bottom right of the diagram. They will each be heating spacetime gas proportional to 1/r^2. Red=hot, white=medium, blue=cool. Spacetime gas is an accumulator for transient energy so you can see that in the center of the grid, the cells are lighter indicating that the sum of the two heating profiles is higher there than say out towards points A or B. This is the simple consequence of summing the two 1/r^2 energy profiles. So, here is a prediction. A and B would be attracted to the highlighted area in the middle of the chart. They are equidistant to the two masses, so the temperature gradients towards the masses cancel out. However, both A and B detect warmer spacetime towards the highlighted cell and will convect there. This is a differentiated idea that could potentially be testable.Prediction Type 1.
There are more predictions contained in my NPQG blog posts and I’ll add them here as I come across them in my writings.
Predictions of NPQG by J Mark Morris
Figure 1

J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : February 22, 2020 : v1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s