Consciousness at Scale

NEOCLASSICAL PHYSICS AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Imagine that nature emerges from a Euclidean 3D void space populated with immutable oppositely charged Planck spheres, which we call the electrino and the positrino. These are the only carriers of energy, in electromagnetic and kinetic form. They observe classical mechanics and Maxwell’s equations. Nature overlays Euclidean space (Map 1) with a lightly interacting Riemannian spacetime æther (Map 2). 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 is compatible with GR, QM, and ΛCDM observations, while providing a superior narrative that explains nature and the universe.
For 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 basics see: Idealized Neoclassical Model and the NPQG Glosssary.

The beauty of consciousness at scale is that you are free and you are not required to look at consciousness ONLY at the scales of space and time that humans span and most normally think about. Imagine looking up at consciousness from the Planck scale at 10-35. What must consciousness look like at decades of scale higher? Which way is energy flowing at each point in the spacetime æther? If you were at Planck scale looking up, wouldn’t it sort of look like what we see above us in galaxies and galaxy clusters and the universe?

If you imagine the universe from the point of view of an imaginary intelligence near Planck scale, they would look outwards through dozens of orders of magnitude towards the energy of the neurons in our brains and our computers and our neural networks as the most advanced reasoning that has emerged during the inflation and subsequent reactions from the Planck scale. Are we the first intelligence to reach this point at the verge of controlling nature? How close are we to influence and then mastery of nature? If other intelligence had mastered nature would they not have signaled in a detectable way? Of course they would, because distances are so great that civilized co-opetition makes 100% sense, and aggression makes zero sense, since energy and matter may be mined directly from spacetime æther.

Have you ever thought about how two individuals interact with each other? I’m sure you have. We all have. But at what levels of interaction psychologically? What layers? There can be significant nuance, right? At least in the perception of one of the communicators? Do they both perceive the same thing? If yes, … do they really? Nuance is a reality. Nuance is not discrete. Let’s explore!

Let’s zoom way down scale and imagine the interaction of two individuals from the standard model scale. Realize that all layers of intelligent life forms are implemented, controlled, and nuanced near their scale, with the potential of feedback to the lower layers and feedforward to the higher layers.

  • An intelligent group of quarks and electrons interacting with each other,
    • in one locus of spacetime
      •  in one individual being
  • And an intelligent group of quarks and electrons interacting with each other
    • many Planck lengths away
      • in another locus of spacetime
        • in the other individual being
  • And the communication media being a combination of time-delayed signals which vary depending on context:
    • “Humans have a multitude of sensors.
      • Sight (vision, visual sense),
      • hearing (audition, auditory sense),
      • taste (gustation, gustatory sense),
      • smell (olfaction, olfactory sense), and
      • touch (somatosensation, somatosensory sense)
      • are the five traditionally recognized senses.” : Wikipedia
    • Over a variety of transmission/reception technologies
      • Neurons and physical chemistry
      • Air molecules and spacetime æther (physical presence)
      • Text Message
      • Voice Call or Message
      • Online Face to Face
      • etc., to IRC, BBS, drums, smoke signals, flags, and horns.
  • Think deeply about the nuance with time and space at discrete scales.
  • Think deeply and imagine the actors at each discrete scale.
  • Are the fundamental actors electrinos and positrinos and Maxwell’s equations just below the standard model?
  • Are the actors at the composite particle layer from the set including standard matter particles, spacetime æther particles, atoms, and molecules along with the four forces of nature?
  • Those who seek unification of forces must understand that spacetime is an æther of particles.
  • All particles have a very small interaction of their wave equations that is proportional to their mass-energy. They interact with a small lossless ebb and flow of energy. This is the media for gravity, which is an energy accumulation, which is temperature, which is convection, which is gravity.
  • We have unified the four fundamental forces from the lower scales.
  • Now consider the emergence of composite forces above.
  • What are the specific conditions and reactions that cause actors to become alive?
  • At what scales does life genesis occur?
  • Life emerges and life evolves.
  • And there are many layers.
  • How many forces are involved in the five senses?
  • What logic and meaning structures do we build based upon input from the five senses?
  • How do those forces shape our behaviour?
  • The composite forces of nature are infinite.
  • Nuance is continuous.

What are your thoughts?

J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : December 12, 2019 : v1
J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : January 1, 2020 : v2

p.s., NPQG describes a nature emergent from the electrino, the positrino, energy, and 3D Euclidean space in which all are described by Maxwell’s equations. The thoughtful reader might realize that science, itself, may be considered as feedback from the scale point of view of emergent nature. Science is currently using extremely crude tools based upon technology many scale orders of magnitude above fundamental nature.

One thought on “Consciousness at Scale

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s