NEOCLASSICAL PHYSICS AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Imagine that nature is emergent from pairs of Planck scale fundamental particles, the electrino and the positrino, which are equal yet oppositely charged. These are the only carriers of energy, in electromagnetic and kinetic form. Now add in an infinite 3D Euclidean space (non curvy) and Maxwell’s equations. 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 explores this recipe for nature and how it emerges as a narrative that is compatible with GR and QM, yet far superior in ability to explain the universe and resolve open problems. For 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 basics see: Idealized Neoclassical Model and the NPQG Glossary.
There are many previously unsolved problems in physics which are or will be solved using the Neoclassical Physics and Quantum Gravity model. In this post I’ll discuss where modern physics is wrong!
WRONG: Supermassive black hole jets are formed when accretion disk material is sucked up to the poles and expelled.
The main driver of supermassive black hole jets is the surface breach of an in-core Planck particle core. The jets are composed of Planck neutrinos and Planck photons which quickly inflate geometrically as they transfer energy, react, and cool. Physicists will need to re-evaluate whether these powerful Planck plasma jets can also suck up accretion disk material.
WRONG: The Big Bang
There was no one time big bang at the beginning. Didn’t happen. The reality is simpler and far more logical. Throughout the universe there are intermittent jets and bangs followed by inflation and all are galaxy local. The process described by the big bang theory is similar to what happens when Planck plasma erupts. Planck plasma can erupt from a supermassive black hole core as a jet under certain conditions. Perhaps a merger of two dense energetic objects (SMBH, BH, NS) can cause an eruption of Planck plasma. If you are familiar with images of jetting supermassive black holes, imagine that we overlay the big bang inflation timeline on both polar jets as a first approximation of the process.
COSMIC INFLATION IS WRONG. LONG LIVE INFLATION!
WRONG: Cosmological Inflation
Since there was no big bang, there was no one time cosmological inflation. Instead, inflation is a routine event in the universe, intermittently occurring when Planck plasma emits from high energy objects or events. In particular, Planck plasma jets from active galactic nuclei (AGN) supermassive black holes (SMBH) are a source of inflation. Therefore, inflation/expansion of outflow may vary slightly depending on the galactic neighborhood.
COSMIC INFLATION IS WRONG. LONG LIVE INFLATION!
Einstein’s general relativity predicts a singularity where general relativity breaks down. This has captured the imagination of the public and befuddled the thinking of physicists. In reality, the “singularity” is a phase change where extremely dense and energetic electrinos and positrinos reach maximum energy and become Planck particles. The “singularity” is not an infinitessimally small point nor wormhole! Instead, a sufficiently energetic black hole may develop a core volume of Planck particles. I imagine these particles forming a lattice, like a crystal, with each particle placed so as to store maximum energy. Think of a black hole core as the ultimate battery. General relativity does not apply to Planck particles and we know that because the general relativity mathematics does not describe the singularity properly. Physically, the implementation of the singularity as a Planck core means a volume of particles at maximum energy, which can neither receive nor transmit gravitational energy. When conditions are sufficient, a Planck core may penetrate as a polar jet, or breach as a bang (not the big bang, but a galaxy-local bang).
WRONG: Einstein’s Curvy Spacetime
Space is 3D Euclidean and flat. Nothing special. A void. A vessel to hold our universe. Overlaid upon space is a superfluid of photons and neutrinos, which are composite particles made from electrinos and positrinos, the two fundamental particles of nature. It is this superfluid which mechanically implements curvy spacetime of Einstein. The superfluid exchanges energy with standard matter and this is the cause of matter-energy mass. The give and take pulsing energy waves between particles heats the superfluid, but fall off at radius squared. Superfluid temperature causes convection of standard matter, i.e., the force of gravity.
WRONG: The Vacuum, the Quantum Vacuum, and Pair Production
There has been a long confused history of science and “empty space.” Let’s go back to 1887 when Michelson-Morley falsified the aether. That was a big oops. All they could really say was that they ruled out an aether at the scales they could measure, which absolutely DOES NOT rule out an aether! In the modern era, physicists think there is a quantum aether which can produce particle-antiparticle pairs. Well, it’s a lot more than just a lucky peak of fluctuating quantum fields! Einstein’s abstract spacetime is hypothesized to be a superfluid of photons and electron neutrinos, dominated by low energy particles. Superfluid may be structured as a foam or lattice of particles and may be a Bose-Einstein condensate.
In the final analysis, it is Hendrik Lorentz that gets his day in the sun. (Pun intended. Did I tell you I was in high school pun club?).
Lorentz helps us get to the root of whether a moving photon source imparts kinetic energy to an emitted photon. Of course it does! The issue is that the Lorentz factor is dictating the energy, so low speed kinetic energy means virtually nothing in terms of the number of 9’s of the speed of light. Note: To be clear, energy is conserved, even in tiny harmonic quanta.
This reminds me of a duality with the world of services and systems where uptime is considered in terms of the number of 9’s of availability. It’s easy for simpletons to think 99.9 and 99.99 and 99.999 are similar. But turn it aroud and imagine trying to squeeze out another 90% of downtime for every additional 9 of availability.
For the modern era, and those more familiar with online games perhaps, the analogy might be that once you achieve 90% of the objective you level-up and reset that last one-tenth as a new 100% objective.
Perhaps I have been lucky to learn an engineering skill related to thinking from a Lorentz factor perspective, and I was fortunate to have the opportunity to apply it to reverse engineering nature! My advice to those learning physics is that it is important to learn the Lorentz factor at a deep level if you want to understand nature. This is scale invariance. Are Maxwell’s equations scale invariant? It seems that they are for a very wide range if not end to end. General relativity appears to only partially break down at the last .000….0001. And maybe it can be repaired, knowing now how the boundary works. Another Ph.D thesis topic suggestion.
WRONG: Show Me the Dark Matter
There isn’t any dark matter. Modern physics TOTALLY MISUNDERSTOOD galaxy dynamics, including rotation curves, because of a tragic comedy of errors.
- Physicists did not understand mass recycling in supermassive black holes.
- Physicists did not realize that the singularity was a phase change.
- Physicists did not realize that black hole jets were from a Planck core.
- Physicists did not realize that spacetime is a material superfluid of standard matter-energy!
- Physicists did not connect the dots on the Lorentz factor.
WRONG: The Speed of Light
First, the speed of light is not a constant. It varies with permittivity and permeability of superfluid and both of those vary based on temperature or energy of the superfluid. Gravitational lensing around dense matter objects is refraction.
Second, there is a very small scale drag that the superfluid imposes on photons.
BRAINSTORMING THE SPEEDS OF LIGHT
WRONG: How to Interpret Redshift
First, see the speed of light discussion. Variable speed of light directly impacts our interpretation of redshift.
Second, inflation is a routine occurrence in the universe, yet scientists have not interpreted redshift properly. The small community that identified anomalous redshift (Arp, Burbridge, et al) were really on to something, but they didn’t know why. Objective physicists should have detected this situation and supported investigations. This is one of many areas where arrogance has obstructed science.
WRONG: Many Worlds Interpretation
Pure and utter hogwash!
See Sean M. Carroll.
CONFUSED: The science interpretation of an active galactic nucleus.
There is a lot going on in an AGN. If the SMBH is jetting, there will be intense inflation. There will be incredibly energetic Planck photons reacting as quickly as possible and releasing energy, and creating standard matter-energy products of those reactions. It is likely a maelstrom of activity and reaction chains. Intense gravity will be attracting matter back towards the galactic plane. Some of the ejecta may have a fate of getting pulled back into the SMBH for another loop of recycling. Certainly, all of this will have impact on galaxy dynamics. A whole new subfield of forensic galaxy history may emerge where the patterns of galaxies and their surroundings can be studied and scientists can rewind and understand galaxy history through simulation.
WRONG: Missing Antimatter (aka Baryon Asymmetry)
The missing antimatter is hiding in plain sight. The proton payload is a positron, aka anti-electron. The neutron payload is an anti-neutrino.
ANTI-MATTER MYSTERY SOLVED!
WRONG: Information may be lost in black holes, and is certainly not stored on the event horizon. The holographic universe concept is wrong.
No information can survive the phase transition to a Planck core.
NATURE DESTROYS INFORMATION
WRONG: The second law of thermodynamics should be an equality. Entropy is conserved.
GR-QM era scientists did not model the superfluid and therefore did not consider the microstates of the superfluid.
FRESH THINKING ON ENTROPY
J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : June 19, 2019 : v1