There are many previously unsolved problems in physics which are or will be solved using the Neoclassical Physics and Quantum Gravity model. In this post I’ll discuss where modern physics is wrong!
WRONG: Supermassive black hole jets are formed when accretion disk material is sucked up to the poles and expelled.
The main driver of supermassive black hole jets is the surface breach of a Planck particle core. The jets are composed of Planck particle plasma which reacts and forms composite particles with shells that inflate geometrically as they transfer energy, react, and cool. Physicists will need to re-evaluate whether these powerful Planck plasma jets can also suck up accretion disk material.
WRONG: The Big Bang
There was no one time inflationary big bang at the beginning of the universe. Didn’t happen. The reality is simpler and far more logical. Throughout the universe there are intermittent mini-bangs followed by inflation and these all are galaxy local. The process described by the big bang theory is similar to what happens when Planck plasma erupts from an SMBH. Planck plasma can erupt from a supermassive black hole core as a polar jets under certain conditions. If you are familiar with images of jetting supermassive black holes, imagine that we overlay the big bang inflation timeline on both polar jets as a first approximation of the process.
COSMIC INFLATION IS WRONG. LONG LIVE INFLATION!
WRONG: Cosmological Inflation
Since there was no big bang, there was no one time cosmological inflation. Instead, inflation is a routine event in the universe, intermittently occurring when Planck plasma emits from high energy objects or events. In particular, Planck plasma jets from active galactic nuclei (AGN) supermassive black holes (SMBH) are a source of inflation. Therefore, inflation/expansion of outflow may vary depending on the galactic neighborhood and the current stage of each galaxy in the recycling process. Interestingly while scientists know that the Big Bang occurred all over the cosmos, and that inflation is ‘eternal’ and ongoing, they do not assign a physical root cause. The AGN SMBH is the quite obvious candidate.
COSMIC INFLATION IS WRONG. LONG LIVE INFLATION!
Einstein’s general relativity predicts a singularity where general relativity breaks down. This has captured the imagination of the public and befuddled the thinking of physicists. In reality, the “singularity” is a phase change where extremely dense and energetic electrinos and positrinos reach maximum energy and merge into a Planck core of a black hole. The “singularity” is not an infinitesimally small point nor wormhole! Instead, a sufficiently energetic black hole may develop a core volume of Planck particles. I imagine these particles forming a lattice, like a crystal, with each particle placed so as to store maximum energy. Think of a black hole core as the ultimate battery. General relativity does not apply to Planck particles and we know that because the general relativity mathematics does not describe the singularity properly. Physically, the implementation of the singularity as a Planck core means a volume of particles at maximum energy, which can neither receive nor transmit gravitational energy. When conditions are sufficient, a Planck core may penetrate as a polar jet, or breach as a bang (not the big bang, but a galaxy-local bang).
WRONG: Einstein’s Curvy Spacetime
The background or vessel for our universe is 3D Euclidean (flat). Nothing special. A void. Permeating this void are spacetime æther particles, which are composite particles made from electrinos and positrinos, the two fundamental particles of nature. It is this spacetime æther which mechanically implements curvy Riemannian spacetime of Einstein. The spacetime æther exchanges energy with standard matter and this is the cause of matter-energy mass. The give and take pulsing energy waves between particles propagates a gravitational wave through the spacetime æther, which fall off at radius squared. The gradient of spacetime æther energy causes convection of standard matter, i.e., the force of gravity.
Related posts: The Local Temperature of the Spacetime Æther
WRONG: The Vacuum, the Quantum Vacuum, and Pair Production
There has been a long confused history of science and “empty space.” Let’s go back to 1887 when Michelson-Morley falsified the aether. That was a big oops. All they could really say was that they ruled out an aether at the scales they could measure, which absolutely DOES NOT rule out an aether! In the modern era, physicists think there is a quantum aether which can produce particle-antiparticle pairs. Well, it’s a lot more than just a lucky peak of fluctuating quantum fields! Einstein’s abstract spacetime is hypothesized to be an æther dominated by low energy particles. Spacetime æther may be structured as a gas, foam, or lattice of particles and may be a Bose-Einstein condensate. Furthermore the spacetime æther has the property that the radius and frequency of the æther particle shell always preserves the distance/time ratio that equals 3 x 108 m/s given that rulers contract and clocks dilate in high energy spacetime.
WRONG: Show Me the Dark Matter
Modern physics TOTALLY MISUNDERSTOOD galaxy dynamics, including rotation curves, because of a tragic comedy of errors.
- Physicists did not understand that spacetime is particle based and contains energy and can participate itself in gravity.
- Physicists did not understand matter-energy recycling in supermassive black holes.
- Physicists did not realize that the singularity was a phase change.
- Physicists did not realize that black hole jets were Planck plasma erupting from a Planck core.
- Physicists did not realize that spacetime is a particle based æther of standard matter-energy!
- Physicists did not understand that galaxy local inflation and expansion.
WRONG: The Speed of Light
The speed of light is a constant when viewed from within the spacetime that, but not a constant if viewed from the absolute Euclidean frame (Map 1) of space and time. In Map 1, c varies with permittivity and permeability of spacetime æther and both of those vary based on energy of the spacetime æther. Gravitational lensing around dense matter-energy objects is refraction.
Related posts: Brainstorming the Speeds of Light
WRONG: How to Interpret Redshift
Second, inflation and expansion are routine occurrences in the universe, yet scientists have not interpreted expansion properly as being galaxy local. The small community that identified anomalous redshift (Arp, Burbidge, et al) were really on to something, but they didn’t know why. Objective physicists should have detected this situation and supported investigations.
CONFUSED: The science interpretation of an active galactic nucleus.
There is a lot going on in an AGN. If the SMBH is jetting, there will be intense inflation. There will be incredibly energetic Planck photons reacting as quickly as possible and releasing energy, and creating standard matter-energy products of those reactions. It is likely a maelstrom of activity and reaction chains. Intense gravity will be attracting matter back towards the galactic plane. Some of the ejecta may have a fate of getting pulled back into the SMBH for another loop of recycling. Certainly, all of this will have impact on galaxy dynamics. A whole new subfield of forensic galaxy history may emerge where the patterns of galaxies and their surroundings can be studied and scientists can rewind and understand galaxy history through simulation.
WRONG: Missing Antimatter (aka Baryon Asymmetry)
The missing antimatter is hiding in plain sight. The proton payload is a positron, aka anti-electron. The neutron payload is an anti-neutrino.
Related posts: Anti-Matter Mystery Solved!
WRONG: Information may be lost in black holes, and is certainly not stored on the event horizon. The holographic universe concept is wrong.
No information can survive the phase transition to a Planck core.
Related post: Nature Destroys Information
WRONG: The second law of thermodynamics should be an equality. Entropy is conserved.
GR-QM era scientists did not model the spacetime æther and therefore did not consider the microstates of the spacetime æther.
Related post: Fresh Thinking on Entropy
J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : June 19, 2019 : v1