Brainstorming on Electrinos and Positrinos

NEOCLASSICAL PHYSICS AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Imagine that nature is emergent from pairs of Planck scale fundamental particles, the electrino and the positrino, which are equal yet oppositely charged. These are the only carriers of energy, in electromagnetic and kinetic form. Now add in an infinite 3D Euclidean space (non curvy) and Maxwell’s equations. 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 explores this recipe for nature and how it emerges as a narrative that is compatible with GR and QM, yet far superior in ability to explain the universe and resolve open problems. For 𝗡𝗣𝗤𝗚 basics see: Idealized Neoclassical Model and the NPQG Glossary.

This is a post of brainstormed ideas. Which of these ideas can stand the test of nature?

  • An electrino/positrino pair is a stable charged magnetic dipole.
  • It must be possible to split an electrino/positrino pair, since many particles aren’t symmetric.
  • Is a photon a stable configuration of six electrino/positrino pairs in the spacetime superfluid gas.
  • Spacetime superfluid gas composed of low energy majorana particles which also serve as shells and transmute into other particles if carrying a payload. Spacetime gas includes low energy neutrinos (tau, muon, electron neutrino types), photons, gravatinos, and Gravitons. Does low energy correspond to relatively low velocity of the particles comprising spacetime gas?
  • Majorana particle shells have neutral charge indicating that the composite formula uses equal numbers of electrinos vs. positrinos.
  • Each of the shell/payload particle formulas has a stability (half-life, decay rate) that depends on an energy range.
  • Do the relatively stable energy ranges for photons and the generations of neutrino particle overlap?
  • Reaction outcome (or stability) is due to both the particle configuration and energy, but also the environment, i.e., spacetime gas temperature and pressure, nearby particles and their geometry, etc.
  • There are an enormous number of different local configurations of electrinos and positrinos when you consider all the composite particles of the standard model, collider products in PDG, periodic table, molecular structure, and so on.
  • The open cells on the electrino vs. positrino formula chart may indicate the possibility of new particles.
  • Why are quarks unstable in a neutrino shell?
  • A neutron is a gravatino with a Z boson payload.
  • A proton is a gravatino with a W+ boson payload.
  • Up quark is an electron neutrino with a 1/5 payload. It is not stable in observed nature. Is the instability related to the asymmetry?
  • Down quark is an electron neutrino with a 4/2 payload. It is not stable. Is the instability related to the asymmetry?.
  • One source of celestial object spin is due to behaviour of dense hot particles in the core (ultimately a Planck core of charged magnetic dipoles).
  • As more energy is transferred to dense hot charged magnetic dipoles, they likewise assume configurations that can store more energy. Up to a point these configurations are associated with faster movement of the electrinos and positrinos but once the speed reaches local speed of light there is a limit. The particles also shrink according to the Lorentz factor which brings charges closer to gether.
  • Energy is stored in both kinetic forms and in electromagnetic forms.
  • These configurations take enormous surrounding energy to contain.
  • Does the angular momentum of particles joining a Planck core transfer to outer layers, causing spin?
  • Does a Planck particle core tend to have alternating manifolds of opposing charged magnetic dipoles? Does a Planck core behave like an electromagnetic battery? a super capacitor? Is a Planck core in an HCP or FCC lattice? What is the highest energy configuration of electrinos and positrinos in a HCP/FCC lattice?
  • This may help explain how some lattice faults are annealed out of the precursor to a Planck core.
  • Still, I presume there remain some faults or shifts in the structure as well as alignment faults when mapping the lattice structure to the spherical nature of the core.
  • The temperature of a particle is its total energy, i.e., the Hamiltonian.
  • Do all epsilons in a particle have the same scalar velocity?
  • Do shells store a different amount of energy than the payload? Is the shell providing containment energy that balances the payload energy?
  • Einstein said \mathbf{E=m c^2} . How do we introduce v, the speed of the electrinos and positrinos ε⊖ & ε⊕, orbiting in the particle shell? Relativistic mass includes a Lorentz gamma multiplier.
  • What is the relationship of the particle energy magnitudes in electromagnetic form and in the kinetic forms, i.e., linear velocity, rotational velocity of the electrino and positrino within the particle shell and payload?
  • Local c depends on permittivity and permeability, which vary with energy stored. The more energy stored, the denser the matter and superfluid gas, and the higher the permittivity and permeability.
  • Energy may only be carried by electrinos and positrinos.
  • The shorter the wavelength, i.e., the faster the frequency, the wave equation path length must get shorter.
  • It does in two ways, by reducing shell size, and by varying the wave equation in harmonics of each shell.
  • Is wavelength the distance traveled by the particle in one wave cycle? Is that distance the same as the wave equation pathlength? If not, how are they related?
  • The penultimate energy particle, just below the energy of the Planck particle, may have the sum energy of harmonics 2..N, where N is the lowest permissible harmonic, i.e., 0x0111…111. It seems like this might be a complicated wave equation. Adding one more Nth harmonic produces the Planck particle with only the first harmonic, 0x1000…000. This is also the ultimate phase change where general relativity breaks down, so perhaps all the Majorana particles have decayed by this point and the electrinos and positrinos localize to 1/1?
  • It is as if the shell radius and speed of the electrinos and positrinos represents both the kinetic and electromagnetic energy stored in the particle shell. At high energy the shell shrinks. As energy is dissipated the shell expands.

PREDICTIONS AND HYPOTHESIS

  • Particle inertial mass is directly related to the energy required for a wave equation solution given the particle’s electrino/positrino formula.
  • The wave equation solution exchanges gravitational energy waves with neighbors, particularly in spacetime gas.
  • Generation II and III fermions have less shell material.
  • Majorana shells particles, undisturbed, are very stable.
  • The speed of light, c, decreases as spacetime gas energy rises.
  • As spacetime gas temperature (energy) increases, the permittivity and permeability rise.
  • Local c is the square root of the inverse of permeability times permittivity of the superfluid gas.
  • Variable speed of light is the cause of refraction around dense matter-energy objects, also known as “gravitational lensing.”

J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : June 18, 2019 : v1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s