There are many previously unsolved problems in physics which are or will be solved using the Neoclassical Physics and Quantum Gravity model. In this post I’ll discuss Time.

Arrow of time (e.g. entropy’s arrow of time): Why does time have a direction? Why did the universe have such low entropy in the past, and time correlates with the universal (but not local) increase in entropy, from the past and to the future, according to the second law of thermodynamics?

WIKIPEDIA

I’m working on an idea that relates time to the wave function orbits of the electrinos and positrinos in a particle. The idea is that the closer the velocity of those particles gets to the (local) speed of light, the slower time becomes. Thus the Planck particles at the core of an SMBH would experience no time because they would have velocity c. I’m also thinking that photons and their constituent electrinos and positrinos may not really travel at c, but something more Lorentzian that depends on their energy and determines their frequency & wavelength. So a Planck photon would start at c, but as it cooled or ceded energy, it’s speed would drop, say for example, to (1 – 10^-35)*c and so on. Across a vast range of frequencies and wavelengths, we would perceive the photon velocity as c because our instruments can’t measure those very small reductions as the photon loses energy via galaxy local expansion, which is actually the root cause of cosmological redshift. But from a Lorentz factor point of view those would still be significant changes for the photon.

PREDICTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

The discrete stable solutions for the NPQG photon wave function define the photon energy, temperature, wavelength, frequency, electrino/positrino (ε⊖ & ε⊕) configuration, ε⊖ & ε⊕ velocities, and conserved dimensions and quantities.

The discrete stable solutions to the NPQG photon wave equation have energy levels that are harmonics corresponding to the Lorentz factor curve relating velocity to local speed of light.

All particle reactions may only trade energy in harmonics (quanta).

The local energy density of the spacetime æther determines the local permittivity and permeability, which in turn determines local speed of light c.

The solutions to the photon wave equations should map parsimoniously to QM and GR.

J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : June 14, 2019 : v1

There are many previously unsolved problems in physics which are or will be solved using the Neoclassical Physics and Quantum Gravity model. In this post I’ll discuss CP and P Symmetry.

Why are CP violations observed in certain weak force decays, but not elsewhere? Are CP violations somehow a product of the second law of thermodynamics, or are they a separate arrow of time?

WIKIPEDIA

No experiment nor model has yet considered the charge parity CP, nor the parity P, symmetry of spacetime æther particles involved in a reaction. If there are undiscovered electrino/positrino composites, they may also play a role in the symmetries of reactions.

PREDICTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

Most measured CP violations will no longer be violations once spacetime æther particles are considered.

CP Symmetry will be restored with a sound Neoclassical Physics theoretical framework supported by mathematical theory.

P symmetry will be restored with a sound Neoclassical Physics theoretical framework supported by mathematical theory..

As this model continues to develop, I am looking forward to the wonderful and elegant mathematical theories that may emerge. I suspect it will not be difficult given that so far the Neoclassical Physics and Quantum Gravity model is based only on logic, algebra, and senses of and appeals to reasoning, symmetry, parsimony, truth, reality, and all other aspects considered scientifically good or even beautiful. “Arguments from beauty have not always been successful” says Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder in her book “Lost in Math.” That is true, and it is also true that arguments from scientific beauty are often successful.

While endeavouring to reverse engineer nature, one joy has been learning, to the best of my ability, the scientific experiments, models, theories, interpretations and narratives. It doesn’t stop there. I’ve also learned scientific intuition about which direction nature lies.

I say “nature lies” as a double entendre. The main meaning I intend is the common understanding: how to locate nature. Scientists are constantly generating mental hypothesis and thinking on whether those hypothesis can sustain the disciplined test of science. Engineers also have this skill. They also employ the scientific method as a professional. Engineers are excellent at reverse engineering problems.

The second meaning of “nature lies” is in reference to how tricky nature has appeared to all those who have attempted to penetrate nature’s secrets.

Is there an aether? Yes!

Wave or particle? Trulyboth, all the time!

Was there a Big Bang? No.

What causes inflation? Cooling jets of Planck plasma!

What is expansion? Galactic outflow of spacetime æther.

Should we adopt a more general concept of a varying spacetime æther flow gradient throughout the universe? Yes.

How old is the universe? We don’t know, nature recycles itself.

Is there dark matter? NPQG provides four mechanisms to explain dark matter, one of which is the spacetime ætherparticle.

Is there dark energy? Yes, but not as currently conceived.

What is cosmological redshift? Galaxy local expansion!

What are the quanta? Electrinos, positrinos, energy harmonics.

Is spacetime æther abstract? No!

What is Einstein’s spacetime? A particle æther in 3D Euclidean space.

Where is all the anti-matter? Hiding in protons and neutrons!

Is nature physical? Yes!

The greatest of nature’s tricks, is that nature emerges from a simple design.

J Mark Morris : San Diego : California : June 14, 2019 : v1